Uncategorized

Lay Down Your Mind

By John Immel

Lay Down Your Mind (Click here to listen to an Presage Publishing MP3 Audio production)

I can make you lay down your mind down in one article. In the space of a few words, you will forgo your motivation to think. No, I won’t put a gun to your head. I won’t originate any violence. You will freely lay your mind aside and bow to my polity. Here is how I will do it: I will remind you of who you really are. And upon concession, you will then cheerfully surrender your time, talents, and resources.

You are scandalized. How could anyone make such a claim? You are daring me inside now, girding yourself against the onslaught. So very sure that it cannot be done. You are an independent thinker, an original thinker and the master of your own destiny. A free man! A free woman!

It is good that you resist: I count on it.

This is no dare. I am not trying to get your hackles up. You are mustering your every determination because it is in your nature to resist, to refuse, to rebel. It is this very trait on which I count.

I am so confident that I encourage you to think through your every defense: the sum of your intellectual arsenal. Review your every worth. Account for all of your resources that will help you against the seduction of my words.

Do you have it all in your mind, the potency of your virtue to resist and think for yourself? Are you quick with the list? Can you rattle off the counterarguments in a moment? Are you totally persuaded of your individual thinking? Are you fully committed to the accuracy of your mental, moral, and spiritual insight? Is your conscience clear in your defense of self?

Hummmm…we shall see.

Actually, my objective will be surprisingly easy: trivially so.

Most everyone has long since conceded their minds because the foundation for abandoning thinking has long since been sown into the collective psyche. Most of you have regularly listened to men who laid the groundwork deep into your souls. Weekly, the leaders of your spiritual life have drummed rational suspicion into your mind. For many people, their college careers affirmed the futility of thinking. And now you often echo your professors’ claim: the more you learn, the less you know.

You often make excuses for the need to think, the need to focus the mind to grasp specifically the difference between good ideas and bad ideas. You are busy. You have a career, a life, a wife, a husband, and children. Your vigor is given elsewhere. You cannot possibly be faulted for giving your energy to more important things.

I agree; you cannot be faulted. Certainly, I will not fault you. Like so many others who share my goal, I encourage you. The burden is great. Lay down the burden. Let someone else take it up. Let pointy-headed academics bat around their intellectual beach balls; they get paid to do such things. Your time is better spent investing in the immediate concerns of your household and career. Besides, what is the use? In the grand scheme, in light of eternity, the turmoil of momentary mental focus is just not that important.

The Bible, the Qur’an, the Vedan holy writings and many other faiths say that knowledge is burdensome and that man’s sin is the pursuit of knowledge. World religions tell us it is so. With a theme so prevalent, how can it not be a Universal Truth? The use of the mind is a burden at best, and a vain manifestation of evil at worst.

See, you are nodding your head and all I have done is hearken to the foundation already laid. You have begun to concede. Isn’t it better to empty yourself of all thought and achieve that Zen bliss of nothingness?

No, don’t be frustrated. You are wrinkling your brow in silent irritation because you see your will to resist crumbling. The feeling will pass as the truth of my words begins to blossom in your soul and you find a peace at abandoning yourself to the cosmic truth. Indeed, all I am really doing is harvesting the crop that has long since been sown.

A few of you will muster resolve. And the harder you hang on to that determination, the more my case will be made; the more you insist to yourself that you are uniquely qualified to stand against my commentary will only prove your guilt.

Let me ask you this.

Where do you get your mental confidence? And more importantly, where do you get your spiritual confidence? Spiritual depravity means your faculties are flawed. You are flawed because you are selfish. How can you be so sure of yourself?

Is your conscience really clear?

How is it you don’t tremble and shake with the temerity of your heart? Certainly, you must be filled with deceitful pride and corrupting arrogance. The resistance in your heart against my commentary is the measure of your pride.

Your hubris leads you to doubt me. So, I will do you the service of reminding you of your failings, of those things that so easily beset. You need a sense of proportion on your own depravity.

Men, those breasts that you noticed…those long legs that caught your attention…did you honestly think that escaped God’s attention? Those natural urges are the product of your sin nature.

And you women…how could you make your brother stumble? How could you let him see the parts of you that bring him to the brink of eternal damnation? How could you be so selfish as to want a man to notice your beauty? Shouldn’t you want him to see the glory of God, and not the glory of flesh?

You’ve done those things, haven’t you?

We all have. We are all fools before God. It is no shame to admit it. It is a shame to NOT admit it.

See, a few of the most humble are nodding now. You are realizing the measure of your temerity to suggest that you could ever have a clear conscience: a conscience that can defend itself. How absurd a thought, because we are all guilty: we are all defenseless. If a spiritual leader could say of himself that he was a chief sinner, how much greater is our guilt before God?

A few of you still defy the truth of my commentary, my considered judgments.

Do you honestly say to yourself that those are not your sins? Oh foolish man, do not be vain in your thinking. Raise the bar on your standards. If you were truly serious with God, you would eliminate all opportunities to exercise your sinful flesh. Every want, every desire, every expression of self is evidence of sin nature. And that self-thinking that you so dearly want to defend…that is the evidence needed to condemn you.

Don’t you know that your heart is utterly wicked? It leads you astray with every futile effort at good. Check your affections. Are they all for God? Is it all of God and NONE of you?

Are you sure? How about the loyalty to your children? Could that loyalty be idolatry? The overwhelming pressure of your parental love will lead you astray. It will make you blaspheme a Holy God if they were to fall into pain. We both know it’s true. Check your heart and confess your sins to your leaders.

Do you not have a leader? So, you have abandoned fellowship. You are out there by yourself. That is to be expected. Un-teachable people isolate themselves from other believers. And what is also to be expected is your level of deception. Your deception is why you have abandoned the people who are appointed to show you the heart’s sinful roots. How can you help but believe doctrines of devils? People submitted to leaders believe correct doctrines, divine doctrines.

It is possible that you have no one to submit, no one to pour out your soul. I humbly request that you come to me and I will give you rest; I will show you the full measure of your guilt. Together we will study the proper understanding of law and gospel. Together we will come to fully know the true depth of your depravity. It will be safe because under my covering, you will always be reminded of the important things, the truly important things.

You need me. You need me to show you how corrupt you really are. You are guilty.

Do you still muster vanity and say you can defend yourself? Hahaha…How is that possible? How can you be so utterly deceived? Do you not know God opposes the proud? He gives grace to the humble. The humble man and woman submit themselves–all of themselves, holding nothing back–to their leaders.

Have you grown so comfortable with your self lies that you believe yourself independent?   Don’t you know that isolation brings deception? Wanting to be free of the community of believers is selfishness. It means you are not giving your time and talents to the Body of Christ. They are not benefiting from your work. It doesn’t seem like it should be so, but selfishness is bondage. You need leaders to free you from the oppression. You need leaders to organize your talents for the common good.

Did you just say to yourself that you do what is necessary? You practice spiritual disciplines and have accountability with other believers. Really? Where does that validation for this security come from? Who said so?

Oh…you may have reformed your life and had some religious affection. We all tell ourselves to take ease, that we are okay with God. We may sustain the face of that religion in public. But in our home, by ourselves, we know what happens in our hearts–the deceits that pervade its every beating moment.

But have you forgotten the Wrath of God is visited upon the unsuspecting suddenly? When they expect nothing of it, and while they are saying Peace and safety, now they see that those things on which they depended for peace and safety were nothing but thin air and empty shadows.

For it is written “He comes as a thief in the night…” and in another place it says “…Their foot shall slide in due time.” Can you really doubt that God holds you over the pit of hell much as one holds a spider or some loathsome insect? He abhors you and is dreadfully provoked. His wrath towards you burns like fire. He looks upon you as worthy of nothing else but to be cast into the fire. He is of purer eyes than to bear to have you in His sight; you are ten thousand times more abominable in His eyes than the most hateful, venomous serpent is in ours.

It is your pride that will send you to the depths of the pit. It is your arrogance that will pave the path to your infernal destruction. Can you still muster the utter temerity to suggest that you are a man or woman of clear conscience? That you are a man or woman with a mind that can justify itself? Can you really?

Okay…This I dare you. Say it in the assembly of the people. Say that you have a clear conscience. Say that your mind is qualified to defend your wants, desires, and value. If you have been so blinded by your great pride before God and cannot heed righteous correction, stand bold in your utter depravity and proclaim it for all to hear.

Is that the silence of assent I hear?

Accept this truth. There is no defense of your Guilt, which means there is no defense of your self, and to try is to sow disaster on your soul. God metes out justice as he sees fit. He is not mocked. Whatever a man sows, that shall he reap.

You dare to reject the gifts He has given unto men? He gave leaders and rulers for discipline and for government of the people. It is the job of leaders to organize the people: their time, talents, and resources. This is how the community carries the glorious truth of Brotherly love and equality in all things to the world.

This effort will demand much. In the Christian faith tradition, Christ suffered for his fellow man. We must therefore also suffer for our fellow man. His sufferings were greater than we could ever endure. He gave the cry of the damned so that we would be spared. Now it is our time to fulfill our part of sacrifice.

Those things that you have, those material possessions of comfort are indulgences that need to be destroyed. Those interests that do not support the community are stumbling blocks that hinder the race you were called to run. Rededicate your life to service.

Your personal pleasure is not the leading consideration. In light of eternity, there is no personal interest, no personal pleasure that can compare. Lay down the temporal so you might embrace the eternal.

That is right, give up crass materialism and decadent consumptions lavished on your flesh. Embrace momentary sufferings so that you might have an eternal joy. Submit your substance to those of us who must bear the burden of administration. Let us distribute for the greater good.

Notice, I did exactly what I said. I originated no violence. I never fired a shot. All I did was show you who you really are. You are guilty. You are without defense. You willingly lay down your mind.

Read More
Uncategorized

Made Free

By John Immel

The Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed. (John 8: 36)

From the inside, people hunger, yearn, and need

The cry of their soul; to be free indeed

Elusive like a reputation that cannot be bought

Corrupted by death, a hope vainly sought

Indulge my thoughts, my words, my whim

Give me no law, Give me no duty, Give me no sin.

The addict, The alcoholic, The Whore;

Doing as they please, bound by a fleshly door

Man is snared as surely as he lives

By his lusts, passions, enemies, and friends

Indulging his whims, fearing their wrath

Like a dog to its vomit, praise he must have

Freedom’s mother is Choice, its father is Want

Birthed of these parents man can plot his course;

Tyrants tremble, and slaves weep

for the power of choice, the power to keep

The counsel of one’s soul, the determination of desire

To live as one wills, to throw off the mire

To the free Joy no longer wars with grief,

Success is not stolen by failure’s thief

Liberty puts health and Life in the hands

A thrill in the heart where Courage stands

Embracing all, condemned by no expectation

Fearing no God, or man, or mortification

The melody of freedom sings over the shame

Destroys the guilt, and heals the pain

A life of choice: both good and bad

Overcoming the chaos, by word, by will, and hand

IF the Son, therefore shall make you free

To choose what you will, whatever you will be

Copywrite 2003 John Immel.  All rights reserved
Read More
Uncategorized

Men and Dogs

By John Immel

Julie asked me to comment on SGM’s thoughts on Biblical Manhood.

I was originally going to answer some related blog posts point for point or at least premise to premise…and I may yet do that in the future. Mandated date nights? The endless squabble over  egalitarian vs complementarian gender benders? The continuous preoccupation with correct expressions of male sexuality? The obsessive preoccupation with female modesty? The prevailing assumption that men really don’t know how to love their wives and women are to be lovingly reminded of their proper place in God’s overarching plan? As I was reading through the dizzying array of thoughts on SGM-related blogs, I realized my point for point commentary is insufficient without some effort to explain the assumptions, presuppositions, and filters driving that commentary.

That is gonna take me a bit. So when you see this rather lengthy intro preceding a post, what follows is foundational ideas that ultimately address “biblical” manhood and “biblical” womanhood.

I said I would, so I’ve dedicated these articles to Julie.

*     *     *
I’m hungry.

“Well, where do you wanna go eat?”

“I don’t care. Where do you wanna go?”

“I don’t know. I don’t have a preference. What do you think?”

“Uhhhhh, well, I really don’t care where we eat, but let’s eat somewhere… I’m hungry.”

And so it goes.

Ever had that conversation before?

What has to happen before the “relationship” can progress?

Somebody needs to voice a preference!

Having a relationship with someone who refuses to voice their wants and desires is about as fulfilling as having a having a dog. It’s comfortable, and you always know you can get affection, and the dogs will always love you, but there is no depth. Somewhere along the line, Christians have gotten the idea that we are supposed to become spiritual lapdogs looking adoringly into God’s face and occasionally liking his hand after he lowers himself to feed us.

I don’t know about you, but I’m not a lapdog.  I am a man.

Men take action, Lapdogs SIT…

Many people think the the perfect Christian expression is how well you can SIT for long periods of time. Passivity is a bad thing, always; and it is definitely not masculine. We turn our passivity into a doctrinal statement by calling it: Waiting on God. When nothing happens, we absolve our impotence by claiming circumstance to a product of God’s manifest hand. We would really like to muster the nerve to tell God, “Hey I want something else.” But we don’t. Our logic tells us that to want anything different is to defy the greatest of Christian callings: SITTING. We pray our prayers, repeating Jesus’ words in Gethsemane, “Not my will, but thine be done.”

But in Gethsemane, God did not impose His desire on Jesus.

He didn’t command Jesus to SIT and wait for the Romans to come nail him to a cross.

It is crucial that you understand this reality.

God made a request: not a demand, not an appointment, not a determination.  God did not orchestrate inescapable circumstances for Jesus to endure.

God made a request.

Jesus had a choice.

A choice requires action. Actions require freedom. Jesus didn’t have to put his life on HOLD to gain the will of God. No, the will of God was something he could embrace and act on, and be a part of in the moment.

Men shall live by faith; Lapdogs live by handout…

Men make their own lives, prepare their own food, and accept the challenge of living. Dogs, on the other hand, wait for someone to feed them, eat the same monotonous food from the same bowl, and beg scraps from his master’s table.

Jesus was a man, and he lived his life like he was a man.

God did not array events against Jesus compelling him to make his act of consecration.

As I already pointed out, Jesus had the power to deliver himself. He could level the approaching mob with his words (i.e. John 18.).  He could let his followers start a war to defend him.

Jesus was not a victim of hopeless circumstance. He was not a prisoner of impossible odds.

I’m going to make this plain:  a Gethsemane experience requires a choice.

I just said a hard thing.

I know this directly implicates people with incurable diseases, or hopeless afflictions. Most people come to grips with hopeless situations by deferring the circumstance to divine will. If God wants things this way, then who am I to argue? If Jesus could say yes to the cross, then I should be able to say yes to _____.

What we really say to ourselves is: “If Jesus could suffer, then I should be able to suffer.” But suffering is the only binding theme between Gethsemane and hopeless human bondage.

I understand why people need to make this equation. What is more, I am sympathetic to the need to find meaning in the middle of suffering. Man can suffer many things, but the one thing he does not tolerate in any expression is futility.

Nature abhors a vacuum.

Human beings abhor futility.

We crumble under the pain of toil. We lose our spirit, our will to live when circumstance seems to have no purpose.

Human beings are determined to understand “why?” Why is life so harsh? Why is there so much pain? Unfortunately, to our ever-increasing madness, life doesn’t give good answers, and somehow when we need his voice the most, God manages to remain painfully quiet.

To solve our own problem, we rush to fill the void. We need a reason for our suffering. We need life to make sense, for there to be a reason for all the madness.

This is powerful motivation to read Jesus’ words in Gethsemane to ease our need. “Not my will, but thy will…” With those six words we have answered all the questions that terrorize our soul. But for all our trying, they are not the same words; it is not the same prayer.

Jesus was really saying: “I will relinquish my ability to deliver myself, and give myself over to your method of delivery.” He was really saying: “I will live by my faith. You will resurrect me!”

We say those six words and really mean: “This circumstance is so far beyond me and my abilities that you must have created them. I don’t have the ability to deliver myself. I am hurting and I suffer. If Jesus could suffer, and that suffering brought Good, then I to will suffer in the hopes that you will bring Good.”

Jesus prayer is one of consecration. Our prayer is a prayer of victimization.

As much as I sympathize, I must point out the failure of our interpretation.   Passivity and victimization go hand in hand. And we have created a body of doctrine that creates a virtue out of both. This is why so many Christians are stuck in circumstances that destroy them.

Men are self-appointed; Lapdogs are kept on a leash…

What are leashes for? Leashes are designed to keep a dog from going where he shouldn’t, getting into things he shouldn’t, or leaving his master’s side when he shouldn’t.

I suppose that leashes say a lot about the dog: his self-destructive nature, his rebellion, his corrupt instinct. Christians are quick to develop the doctrines of the lapdog.

But leashes say as much about the master as they do the dog. Truthfully, a leash says more about the master. Dogs operate from instinct. They have no sense of right and wrong. They might understand their master’s displeasure. And being dogs, they are motivated please, but they don’t choose what ground to sniff by a profound understanding of the Ten Commandments.

Dog trainers are unanimous in this assumption: it is never the dog’s fault.  Whatever the master wanted the dog to do but failed to execute, it is the sole responsibility of the master:  to train effectively, his failure to communicate effectively, his ultimate disregard for the dog reaching its fullest expression of freedom.

Hummmm, this one is gonna hit close to home.

As I have already said: Gethsemane gets mixed into Jesus’ exhortation to pick up the cross and follow him. Now let me expand on the comment.

We have read Jesus’ words to like this: “I should be suspicious of my wants and desires. So therefore, I need to kill them at the cross everyday.” Our personal experience affirms our interpretation because we sin, and then we wonder: “If I am born again,” we say to ourselves, “how then can I do these evil things?” We then search the scriptures to find an answer. The second building block of our assumption comes from our historic reading of Romans 7. Paul outlines a basic conflict between the law and our inward drive to do right. We identify with that conflict and think it normal for all of life. We then decide that Gethsemane is a template. And that template affirms our basic assumption:  If Jesus could deny himself and suffer, then I must be willing to suffer.

Whatever the need for this thinking, it makes us miss this fact:  Gethsemane was not a lifestyle.

Jesus didn’t live his life on a leash. The actions of Jesus’ life were strikingly harmonized. Sleeping, eating, living, loving as he saw fit, even in the face of threat, and opposition, and hardship. God did not drive him to action with pain or bring him to a halt with insurmountable circumstance.

Whatever our shortcoming, however miserably we fall short of this standard, this is the freedom for which Jesus paid. The point Gethsemane was end the hostility between Man and God so we could live in the Covenants of Promise.   His CHOICE in Gethsemane was for the express purpose of giving us the power to make choices, to exercise our preference and have an individual relationship with the God of Heaven and Earth.

Men Choose. Dogs obey.

Read More
Sovereign Grace

Sovereign Grace Motive

By John Immel

Concerned asked me a couple of questions in my post Speaking of Church Polity.  I think the content of the question and the corresponding answer needs its own treatment.

Here is what she asked:

John, in reading some things about the various forms of church government, it seems most “truly” reformed churches adhere to either a congregational or presbyterian form of church government. However, the SGM model is episcopalian it seems (heirarchy: power flows from the top down only)

So here is my question – why do you think SGM tries to pass themselves off as Reformed simply because they are Calvinistic when none of their other beliefs remotely resemble historical reformed theology?

Is is fair to say SGM is Calvinistic but not reformed, even though they call themselves reformed?

*     *     *

I LOVE these questions.  I ABSOLUTELY LOVE THESE QUESTIONS.  LOVE IT.  LOVE IT. LOVE IT.  That means you all are catching on.  These questions show forth that people are actually looking at the content of what the Hair Club for Men claim.  And if you are looking at the content, it becomes very easy to see that the Arena of Ideas they fancy themselves in is NOT as neat and tidy and unarguable as Sovereign Grace Ministries would like to pretend.

Concerned, the heart of your question is WHY? Why does SGM do what they do? Why do they call themselves Reformed when in fact they don’t conform to the content of the Reformed Practice? It is always a bold undertaking to answer about someone else’s motive.  But I’m up to the challenge.

The short answer to why does Sovereign Grace Ministries claim Reformed Status is fear.

No… let me amend. The short answer to why does Sovereign Grace Ministries claim Reformed Status is stone cold, stark terror.

What are they afraid of?  They are afraid that they are not truly authorized to preach, that they really may not be in charge, that they might not have anything to offer, that at the end of the day that they (CJ) might be wrong.

I know… that is a rather bold, generalizing explanation, but given the time and space, I’m pretty sure that I can lay out the parts and pieces of their overriding preoccupation.

But Exhibit A is embedded in Eric “Phenomenal” Simmons’ comments about bloggers. Well, not about bloggers specifically but his overarching need to discredit those folks on the Internet as irrelevant post-adolescents with nothing but heresy to talk about.  His comments are pure demagoguery, designed to play on the fears of his CLC audience to warn them away from ideas: ideas he cannot compete with.

The mindset of fear is endemic within the Sovereign Grace Ministries’ culture.

Exhibit B is their history. Long before SGM was… SGM, they were GOB and PDI/CLC. Their foray into shepherding is part and parcel of the same preoccupation: who is authorized to be in charge, and preach, and arbitrate God stuff. CJ and Larry Tomczak, et al were authoritarian LOOOOONNNNNGGGGG before they read Piper, and Spurgeon, and Packer.

Exhibit C is how they use the doctrines of Reformed Theology. I want to expand on this last point so I need to illustrate some Sovereign Grace Ministries algebra.

“watch your life and your doctrine” = mentally reflecting + Good Theology = Sound Doctrine = a specific Theological system = Orthodoxy = Authentic Christianity.

Orthodoxy = Reformed Theology

Ergo

Authentic Christianity = Reformed Theology

AND

Reformed Theology = Calvinism

With me so far? Okay… good.

Now I need to add the last part of the SGM equation.

Passioned Orthodoxy = PDI Passion + Orthodoxy

The last part of the equation is most important to your original question “How can SGM claim to be REFORMED when they really don’t adhere to the totality of REFORMED TRADITION?”

See, Sovereign Grace Ministries wants to play both sides of the intellectual fence. They use “Reformed Theology” to deflect criticism.  Object to the content of their doctrine and they immediately say, “But we are Orthodox, how can you object? We believe what all right-thinking historic Christians have always believed. How can you object to what Paul himself preached ‘Christ and him crucified’?” Upon criticism, the critic places himself unsound doctrine camp eliminating his disparagement from consideration.

But as PDI/CLC were making the transition from the charismatic-ish movement to the Reformed Tradition, they ran square into their first and second departure from Orthodox teaching. Reformed doctrine is the home of cessationist teaching… meaning the gifts of the spirit–tongues, healing, et al.–passed away.  Many of the churches of the reformed tradition prohibited music and musical instruments from worship.

What to do? We are a bunch of ’60s throwbacks that like to jump around at a rock concert in our tie dyes. Bob Kauflin isn’t going to stop playing the electric piano. And we’re not going to suddenly disavow speaking in tongues for the last 20 years.

How do we justify departures from the very orthodoxy that we use to validate our doctrine?

Well… in reality, they just ignore the implications. But their PR machine went into full gear and decided their doctrinal deviations were the product of Passion. Well… who can argue with that?

Their use of Reformed Theology is a smokescreen to insulate themselves from criticism of the content of their practice. Their deviations from the Reformed Tradition are justified as modern expressions of their unique Sovereign Grace Ministries passion.

As for their use of Calvinism … well … if there was ever a body of teaching that absolved a man of the outcomes of his doctrine … this is it. If you pray for the sick and folks don’t get well, what is the reason?  God is sovereign. Ergo, the content of your life is the product of Divine will. You preach endlessly that folks should not sin but yet they do. This is living proof of the doctrine of Pervasive Depravity. You pray for the unbeliever to get saved but yet they don’t respond.  That is a function of Limited Atonement. You preach the hard truth of the Gospel, but folks leave your church and call you a cult.  No mystery here, this is the doctrine of Perseverance of the Saints in action. If one cannot persevere in the hard truth, those who leave are living God’s necessarily appointed deception.

As a pastor, how can you be held accountable to ANY outcome within the body? Logically, you can’t and practically you won’t because the doctrine exempts outcomes from your preview.

As for their polity … in practice, SGM are papists. Charles Joseph is the Vicar.

Read More